If you need an accessible version of this item please contact JSTOR User Support

Interspecific Competition between Root-Feeding and Leaf-Galling Aphids Mediated by Host-Plant Resistance

Nancy A. Moran and Thomas G. Whitham
Ecology
Vol. 71, No. 3 (Jun., 1990), pp. 1050-1058
DOI: 10.2307/1937373
Stable URL: http://www.jstor.org/stable/1937373
Page Count: 9
  • Download PDF
  • Cite this Item

You are not currently logged in.

Access your personal account or get JSTOR access through your library or other institution:

login

Log in to your personal account or through your institution.

If you need an accessible version of this item please contact JSTOR User Support
Interspecific Competition between Root-Feeding and Leaf-Galling Aphids Mediated by Host-Plant Resistance
Preview not available

Abstract

While the competitive interactions of herbivores are often debated, rarely have the resistance traits of their host plants been considered as an important factor that might determine the outcome of an interaction. In the study reported here, host-mediated interactions were explored for two aphid species that feed on plants of the genus Chenopodium. Pemphigus betae feeds underground on roots, while Hayhurstia atriplicis feeds aboveground where it forms leaf galls. Although they never encountered one another directly, these two aphid species shared a common resource, the phloem sap of their host. We examined the effects of each of these herbivore species on their host plants and on one another through several garden and growth chamber experiments. Four major results emerged. First, the root-feeding aphid P. betae had no significant effects on its hosts. In contrast, leaf galling by H. atriplicis reduced overall host mass by an average of 54% and seed set by an average of 60%. Second, competitive interactions between the herbivore species depended on the level of host resistance to leaf galling by H. atriplicis. On susceptible plants, leaf-galling colonies of H. atriplicis reduced P. betae numbers by an average of 91%, often eliminating the root feeders entirely. In contrast, on plants resistant to galling, H. atriplicis colonies were smaller and did not affect P. betae infesting roots of the same hosts. Third, the interaction was asymmetrical; although H. atriplicis had a strong negative effect on P. betae, the latter showed no measurable effects on H. atriplicis. Censuses indicated that the strong negative effects of H. atriplicis on P. betae, as found in the growth chamber and garden experiments, also take place naturally in the field. Fourth, although one might expect plants resistant to one aphid species to be resistant to other aphids also, resistance to leaf-galling aphids is not correlated with resistance to root-feeding aphids in this system.

Page Thumbnails

  • Thumbnail: Page 
[1050]
    [1050]
  • Thumbnail: Page 
1051
    1051
  • Thumbnail: Page 
1052
    1052
  • Thumbnail: Page 
1053
    1053
  • Thumbnail: Page 
1054
    1054
  • Thumbnail: Page 
1055
    1055
  • Thumbnail: Page 
1056
    1056
  • Thumbnail: Page 
1057
    1057
  • Thumbnail: Page 
1058
    1058