Access

You are not currently logged in.

Access JSTOR through your library or other institution:

login

Log in through your institution.

Journal Article

Predation Risk and Unpredictable Feeding Conditions: Determinants of Body Mass in Birds

Steven L. Lima
Ecology
Vol. 67, No. 2 (Apr., 1986), pp. 377-385
Published by: Wiley on behalf of the Ecological Society of America
DOI: 10.2307/1938580
Stable URL: http://www.jstor.org/stable/1938580
Page Count: 9

You can always find the topics here!

Topics: Birds, Fats, Predation, Sparrows, Starvation, Simulations, Body temperature, Predators, Species, Modeling
Were these topics helpful?
See something inaccurate? Let us know!

Select the topics that are inaccurate.

Cancel
  • Download ($42.00)
  • Subscribe ($19.50)
  • Add to My Lists
  • Cite this Item
Predation Risk and Unpredictable Feeding Conditions: Determinants of Body Mass in Birds
Preview not available

Abstract

The body mass (or fat reserves) maintained by a wintering bird can be viewed as a trade-off between the risk of starvation and the risk of predation. This follows from the fact that fat reserves after survival in very different ways. From the starvation point of view, a bird should be as fat (or heavy) as possible in order to minimize its probability of starvation during weather-related food unavailability because fatter birds can survive longer without food than leaner birds. From the predation risk point of view, however, a bird should be as lean as possible to minimize its probability of being killed. Leaner birds will incur a smaller cost of existence than heavier birds and thus spend less time feeding, potentially exposed to predators. In addition, lean birds are likely to be more adept at escaping predators once attacked. If a bird is attempting to minimize its probability of death during the winter season, the fat reserves and thus the body mass it maintains will reflect a trade-off between starvation and predation risk. A simple stochastic simulation model developed to explore the nature of this trade-off indicates that body mass should: (1) increase with the frequency and/or harshness of periods of food unavailability (due to snow, ice, wind, etc.); (2) decreases with increasing predation risk; (3) decrease with increasing temperature; and (4) increase with food abundance. The analysis of the model readily explains why wintering birds maintain fat levels lower than those of which they are capable. The tendency for individuals of a given bird species to be heavier in more northerly populations and during midwinter is also readily interpreted in terms of the above trade-off. Implications for foraging behavior and population regulation in wintering birds are discussed.

Page Thumbnails

  • Thumbnail: Page 
377
    377
  • Thumbnail: Page 
378
    378
  • Thumbnail: Page 
379
    379
  • Thumbnail: Page 
380
    380
  • Thumbnail: Page 
381
    381
  • Thumbnail: Page 
382
    382
  • Thumbnail: Page 
383
    383
  • Thumbnail: Page 
384
    384
  • Thumbnail: Page 
385
    385