You are not currently logged in.

Access your personal account or get JSTOR access through your library or other institution:


Log in to your personal account or through your institution.

Canonical Correspondence Analysis: A New Eigenvector Technique for Multivariate Direct Gradient Analysis

Cajo J. F. Ter Braak
Vol. 67, No. 5 (Oct., 1986), pp. 1167-1179
Published by: Wiley
DOI: 10.2307/1938672
Stable URL:
Page Count: 13
  • Download PDF
  • Add to My Lists
  • Cite this Item
Canonical Correspondence Analysis: A New Eigenvector Technique for Multivariate Direct Gradient Analysis
We're having trouble loading this content. Download PDF instead.


A new multivariate analysis technique, developed to relate community composition to known variation in the environment, is described. The technique is an extension of correspondence analysis (reciprocal averaging), a popular ordination technique that extracts continuous axes of variation from species occurrence or abundance data. Such ordination axes are typically interpreted with the help of external knowledge and data on environmental variables; this two-step approach (ordination followed by environmental gradient identification) is termed indirect gradient analysis. In the new technique, called canonical correspondence analysis, ordination axes are chosen in the light of known environmental variables by imposing the extra restriction that the axes be linear combinations of environmental variables. In this way community variation can be directly related to environmental variation. The environmental variables may be quantitative or nominal. As many axes can be extracted as there are environmental variables. The method of detrending can be incorporated in the technique to remove arch effects. (Detrended) canonical correspondence analysis is an efficient ordination technique when species have bell-shaped response curves or surfaces with respect to environmental gradients, and is therefore more appropriate for analyzing data on community composition and environmental variables than canonical correlation analysis. The new technique leads to an ordination diagram in which points represent species and sites, and vectors represent environmental variables. Such a diagram shows the patterns of variation in community composition that can be explained best by the environmental variables and also visualizes approximately the @'centers@' of the species distributions along each of the environmental variables. Such diagrams effectively summarized relationships between community and environment for data sets on hunting spiders, dyke vegetation, and algae along a pollution gradient.

Notes and References

This item contains 30 references.

Literature Cited
  • Austin, M. P., R. B. Cunningham, and P. M. Fleming. 1984. New approaches to direct gradient analysis using environ? mental scalars and statistical curve-fitting procedures. Veg- etatio 55:11-27.
  • Bartlein, P. J., I. C. Prentice, and T. Webb, III. 1986. Cli? matic response surfaces from pollen data for some eastern North American taxa. Journal of Biogeography 13:35-57.
  • Carleton,T. J. 1984. Residual ordination analysis: a method for exploring vegetation-environment relationships. Ecol- ogy 65:469-477.
  • De Lange, L. 1972. An ecological study of ditch vegetation in the Netherlands. Dissertation. University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
  • De Leeuw, J. 1984. The GIFI system of nonlinear multi- variate analysis. Pages 415-424 in E. Diday, M. Jambu, L. Lebart, J. Pages, and R. Tomassone, editors. Data analysis and informatics III. North-Holland Publishing, Amster? dam, The Netherlands.
  • Fricke, G., and L. Steubing. 1984. Die Verbreitung von Makrophyten und Mikrophyten in Hartwasser-Zuflusse des Ederstausees. Archiv für Hydrobiologie 101:361-372.
  • Gabriel, K. R. 1971. The biplot graphic display of matrices with application to principal component analysis. Biomet- rika 58:453-467.
  • —. 1981. Biplot display of multivariate matrices for inspection of data and diagnosis. Pages 147-173 in V. Bar- nett, editor. Interpreting multivariate data. J. Wiley and Sons, New York, New York, USA.
  • Gasse, F., and F. Tekaia. 1983. Transfer functions for es? timating paleoecological conditions (pH) from East African diatoms. Hydrobiologia 103:85-90.
  • Gauch, H. G. 1982<2. Multivariate analysis in community ecology. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, England.
  • -. 1982?. Noise reduction by eigenvector ordinations. Ecology 63:1643-1649.
  • Gauch, H. G., G. B. Chase, and R. H. Whittaker. 1974. Ordination of vegetation samples by Gaussian species dis? tributions. Ecology 55:1382-1390.
  • Gauch, H. G., and E. L. Stone. 1979. Vegetation and soil pattern in a mesophytic forest at Ithaca, New York. Amer- ican Midland Naturalist 102:332-345.
  • Gauch, H. G., and T. R. Wentworth. 1976. Canonical cor? relation analysis as an ordination technique. Vegetatio 33: 17-22
  • Gittins, R. 1985. Canonical analysis. A review with appli- cations in ecology. Springer-Verlag, Berlin, Germany.
  • Greenacre, M. J. 1984. Theory and applications of corre- spondence analysis. Academic Press, London, England.
  • Hill, M. O. 1977. Use of simple discriminant functions to classify quantitative phytosociological data. Pages 597-613 in E. Diday, L. Lebart, J. P. Pages, and R. Tomassone, editors. Data analysis and informatics, I. Institut de Re- cherche d'Informatique et dAutomatique, Le Chesnay Cedex, France.
  • —. 1979. DECORANA: A FORTRAN program for detrended correspondence analysis and reciprocal averag- ing. Section of Ecology and Systematics, Cornell University, Ithaca, New York, USA.
  • Hill, M. O., and H. G. Gauch. 1980. Detrended correspon? dence analysis, an improved ordination technique. Veg- etatio 42:47-58.
  • Loucks, O. L. 1962. Ordinating forest communities by means of environmental scalars and phytosociological indices. Ecological Monographs 32:137-166.
  • Mardia, K. V., J. T. Kent, and J. M. Bibby. 1979. Multi- variate analysis. Academic Press, London, England.
  • Montgomery, D. C, and E. A. Peck. 1982. Introduction to linear regession analysis. J. Wiley and Sons, New York, New York, USA.
  • Swaine, M. D., and P. Greig-Smith. 1980. An application of principal components analysis to vegetation change in permanent plots. Journal of Ecology 68:33-41.
  • Ter Braak, C. J. F. 1983. Principal components biplots and alpha and beta diversity. Ecology 64:454-462.
  • —. 1985a. CANOCO: A FORTRAN program for ca- nonical correspondence analysis and detrended correspon- dence analysis. IWIS-TNO, Wageningen, The Netherlands.
  • -. 1985/?. Correspondence analysis of incidence and abundance data: properties in terms of a unimodal response model. Biometrics 41:859-873.
  • Ter Braak, C. J. F., and C. W. N. Looman. In press 1986. Weighted averaging, logistic regression and the Gaussian response model. Vegetatio 65:3-11.
  • Van der Aart, P. J. M., and N. Smeek-Enserink. 1975. Cor? relations between distributions of hunting spiders (Lyco- sidae, Ctenidae) and environmental characteristics in a dune area. Netherlands Journal of Zoology 25:1-45.
  • Whittaker, R. H. 1967. Gradient analysis of vegetation. Biological Reviews of the Cambridge Philosophical Society 42:207-264.
  • Whittaker, R. H., S. A. Levin, and R. B. Root. 1973. Niche, habitat and ecotope. American Naturalist 107:321-338.