You are not currently logged in.
Access JSTOR through your library or other institution:
If You Use a Screen ReaderThis content is available through Read Online (Free) program, which relies on page scans. Since scans are not currently available to screen readers, please contact JSTOR User Support for access. We'll provide a PDF copy for your screen reader.
Attitude Attribution: A Group Basis for Political Reasoning
Henry E. Brady and Paul M. Sniderman
The American Political Science Review
Vol. 79, No. 4 (Dec., 1985), pp. 1061-1078
Published by: American Political Science Association
Stable URL: http://www.jstor.org/stable/1956248
Page Count: 18
You can always find the topics here!Topics: Liberalism, Conservatism, Political attitudes, Political science, Liberal arts education, Heuristics, Social psychology, Likability, Estimation methods, Mathematical independent variables
Were these topics helpful?See something inaccurate? Let us know!
Select the topics that are inaccurate.
Since scans are not currently available to screen readers, please contact JSTOR User Support for access. We'll provide a PDF copy for your screen reader.
Preview not available
This article shows that citizens can estimate what politically strategic groups--liberals and conservatives, Democrats and Republicans, and blacks and whites--stand for on major issues. These attitude attributions follow from a simple calculus, a likability heuristic. This heuristic is rooted in people's likes and dislikes of political groups. Thanks to this affective calculus, many in the mass public are able to estimate who stands for what politically, notwithstanding shortfalls in information and information processing.
The American Political Science Review © 1985 American Political Science Association