You are not currently logged in.
Access JSTOR through your library or other institution:
If You Use a Screen ReaderThis content is available through Read Online (Free) program, which relies on page scans. Since scans are not currently available to screen readers, please contact JSTOR User Support for access. We'll provide a PDF copy for your screen reader.
National Entanglements in International Governmental Organizations
Harold K. Jacobson, William M. Reisinger and Todd Mathers
The American Political Science Review
Vol. 80, No. 1 (Mar., 1986), pp. 141-159
Published by: American Political Science Association
Stable URL: http://www.jstor.org/stable/1957088
Page Count: 19
You can always find the topics here!Topics: Intergovernmental organizations, Functionalism, Political systems, Gross national product, Government, International governmental organizations, Economic systems, World wars, Socialism
Were these topics helpful?See something inaccurate? Let us know!
Select the topics that are inaccurate.
Since scans are not currently available to screen readers, please contact JSTOR User Support for access. We'll provide a PDF copy for your screen reader.
Preview not available
There has been a growing propensity among states to associate together in international governmental organizations, or IGOs, for a variety of purposes. Why do states join IGOs, and what are the consequences for states of membership in IGOs? In this analysis, an explanation is sought, drawing on the theory of functionalism espoused by David Mitrany and others, taking into account the number of years a state has had sovereignty, level of technology, extent of party competition, and overall power. For Third World states, membership in IGOs is associated with enhanced economic performance. An increasing number of IGOs in the system appears to lessen the states' mean proneness to war. Functionalist predictions are upheld. But functionalism needs to be supplemented both for comprehensive explanations and as a prescription for the future. Already there are so many IGOs that it is difficult for states to control them, which could make them progressively irrelevant or even jeopardize their existence.
The American Political Science Review © 1986 American Political Science Association