You are not currently logged in.
Access JSTOR through your library or other institution:
If You Use a Screen ReaderThis content is available through Read Online (Free) program, which relies on page scans. Since scans are not currently available to screen readers, please contact JSTOR User Support for access. We'll provide a PDF copy for your screen reader.
Liberation Theology: The Recovery of Biblical Radicalism
H. Mark Roelofs
The American Political Science Review
Vol. 82, No. 2 (Jun., 1988), pp. 549-566
Published by: American Political Science Association
Stable URL: http://www.jstor.org/stable/1957400
Page Count: 18
You can always find the topics here!Topics: Radicalism, Liberation theology, Bible, Christianity, Churches, Marxian economics, Theology, Political science, Latin American literature, Egalitarianism
Were these topics helpful?See somethings inaccurate? Let us know!
Select the topics that are inaccurate.
Since scans are not currently available to screen readers, please contact JSTOR User Support for access. We'll provide a PDF copy for your screen reader.
Preview not available
Liberation theology is not a marxism in Christian disguise. It is the recovery of a biblical radicalism that has been harbored in the Judeo Christian tradition virtually from its founding. As such, liberation theology is the revitalization of one of the most profound social, political, economic, and religious challenges to established hierarchies that the West has ever known. Liberation theologians turn to modern Marxism chiefly to gain a comprehensive understanding of contemporary class conflict and poverty. Their primary concerns remain to define themselves as an @'emergent church@' in the biblical tradition, and to reflect upon the praxis of the @'base community@' movement they have spawned throughout Latin America. However, the principal liberation theologians of our day exhibit persistent ambiguities about how individuals should relate to their communities. The biblical materials suggest certain solutions to them, but ones to radical not even the most extreme of the liberation theologians appear ready to embrace them.
The American Political Science Review © 1988 American Political Science Association