You are not currently logged in.
Access JSTOR through your library or other institution:
If You Use a Screen ReaderThis content is available through Read Online (Free) program, which relies on page scans. Since scans are not currently available to screen readers, please contact JSTOR User Support for access. We'll provide a PDF copy for your screen reader.
Do Endorsements Matter? Group Influence in the 1984 Democratic Caucuses
Ronald B. Rapoport, Walter J. Stone and Alan I. Abramowitz
The American Political Science Review
Vol. 85, No. 1 (Mar., 1991), pp. 193-203
Published by: American Political Science Association
Stable URL: http://www.jstor.org/stable/1962885
Page Count: 11
You can always find the topics here!Topics: Caucuses, Political candidates, Labor unions, Political campaigns, Teachers, Political parties, Political science, Teacher organizations, Womens rights, Voting
Were these topics helpful?See somethings inaccurate? Let us know!
Select the topics that are inaccurate.
Since scans are not currently available to screen readers, please contact JSTOR User Support for access. We'll provide a PDF copy for your screen reader.
Preview not available
Although candidates are very concerned about garnering prenomination group endorsements, there is virtually no research on the effects of such endorsements at the presidential level. In 1984, teachers', women's, and labor groups all endorsed Mondale for the Democratic nomination. Using a survey of Democratic caucus participants, we examine the effects of these endorsements on both candidate support and prenomination activity for the endorsed candidate. We find substantial effects of labor and teachers' group endorsements on the candidate choice of their members, but virtually no effect of women's groups. Labor union membership also had the greatest impact on campaign activity for Mondale.
The American Political Science Review © 1991 American Political Science Association