You are not currently logged in.
Access JSTOR through your library or other institution:
If You Use a Screen ReaderThis content is available through Read Online (Free) program, which relies on page scans. Since scans are not currently available to screen readers, please contact JSTOR User Support for access. We'll provide a PDF copy for your screen reader.
Senate Voting on Supreme Court Nominees: A Neoinstitutional Model
Charles M. Cameron, Albert D. Cover and Jeffrey A. Segal
The American Political Science Review
Vol. 84, No. 2 (Jun., 1990), pp. 525-534
Published by: American Political Science Association
Stable URL: http://www.jstor.org/stable/1963533
Page Count: 10
You can always find the topics here!Topics: Voting, Senators, United States Senate, Puzzles, Liberalism, Upper houses, Statistical models, Spatial models, Modeling
Were these topics helpful?See something inaccurate? Let us know!
Select the topics that are inaccurate.
Since scans are not currently available to screen readers, please contact JSTOR User Support for access. We'll provide a PDF copy for your screen reader.
Preview not available
We develop and test a neoinstitutional model of Senate roll call voting on nominees to the Supreme Court. The statistical model assumes that Senators examine the characteristics of nominees and use their roll call votes to establish an electorally attractive position on the nominees. The model is tested with probit estimates on the 2,054 confirmation votes from Earl Warren to Anthony Kennedy. The model performs remarkably well in predicting the individual votes of Senators to confirm or reject nominees. Senators routinely vote to confirm nominees who are perceived as well qualified and ideologically proximate to Senators' constituents. When nominees are less well qualified and are relatively distant, however, Senators' votes depend to a large degree on the political environment, especially the status of the president.
The American Political Science Review © 1990 American Political Science Association