You are not currently logged in.
Access JSTOR through your library or other institution:
If You Use a Screen ReaderThis content is available through Read Online (Free) program, which relies on page scans. Since scans are not currently available to screen readers, please contact JSTOR User Support for access. We'll provide a PDF copy for your screen reader.
"Sophisticated" Voting in the 1988 Presidential Primaries
Paul R. Abramson, John H. Aldrich, Phil Paolino and David W. Rohde
The American Political Science Review
Vol. 86, No. 1 (Mar., 1992), pp. 55-69
Published by: American Political Science Association
Stable URL: http://www.jstor.org/stable/1964015
Page Count: 15
You can always find the topics here!Topics: Voting, Political candidates, Viability, Primary elections, Political parties, Political campaigns, Political science, Caucuses, Presidential elections, Polls
Were these topics helpful?See something inaccurate? Let us know!
Select the topics that are inaccurate.
Since scans are not currently available to screen readers, please contact JSTOR User Support for access. We'll provide a PDF copy for your screen reader.
Preview not available
Voters in multicandidate contests may confront circumstances under which it is in their interest to vote for a second- or even lower-ranked candidate. The U.S. electoral system, typically offering a choice between only two major contenders, rarely presents opportunities for this "sophisticated" voting. In presidential primaries, however, many plausible candidates may compete. We investigate the presence of sophisticated voting in the 1988 presidential primaries, using data from the National Election Study's Super Tuesday survey. We examine patterns of voting types based on ordinal measures of preferences among candidates and assessments of their chances of winning their party's nomination and estimate several models of choice, testing the multicandidate calculus of voting. Among both Republicans and Democrats, respondents' choices were consistent with the calculus of voting and thus with sophisticated voting.
The American Political Science Review © 1992 American Political Science Association