You are not currently logged in.
Access JSTOR through your library or other institution:
If You Use a Screen ReaderThis content is available through Read Online (Free) program, which relies on page scans. Since scans are not currently available to screen readers, please contact JSTOR User Support for access. We'll provide a PDF copy for your screen reader.
Sex Roles in Instructional Materials: Testing the Stereotypes
Margot L. Zimmerman, Maria Elena Casanova, Dianna P. Stern and Sarah S. Auman
Studies in Family Planning
Vol. 13, No. 8/9 (Aug. - Sep., 1982), pp. 262-270
Published by: Population Council
Stable URL: http://www.jstor.org/stable/1965566
Page Count: 9
You can always find the topics here!Topics: Children, Child care, Men, Mothers, Gender roles, Fathers, Medical personnel, Diarrhea, Parents, Family planning
Were these topics helpful?See somethings inaccurate? Let us know!
Select the topics that are inaccurate.
Since scans are not currently available to screen readers, please contact JSTOR User Support for access. We'll provide a PDF copy for your screen reader.
Preview not available
This special report discusses the significance and potential benefit of portraying men in nontraditional sex roles within pictorial instructional print materials on health and child care. It is based on the cognitive and behavioral findings of a comparative research study conducted in selected rural and periurban areas of Mexico on the use of two versions of an ORS pictorial pamphlet. Major findings of the study were: (1) portraying nontraditional sex roles for men in the ORS pamphlet did not reduce the credibility of technical information contained in the pamphlet; (2) a significantly greater number of subjects preferred the version that portrayed the father figure as co-caretaker of a sick child. These unexpected results have important implications for instructional and motivational communication and health education projects throughout the developing world.
Studies in Family Planning © 1982 Population Council