Access

You are not currently logged in.

Access your personal account or get JSTOR access through your library or other institution:

login

Log in to your personal account or through your institution.

If you need an accessible version of this item please contact JSTOR User Support

Lieberson's Isolation Index; A Case Study Evaluation

Vaughan Robinson
Area
Vol. 12, No. 4 (1980), pp. 307-312
Stable URL: http://www.jstor.org/stable/20001630
Page Count: 6
  • Read Online (Free)
  • Download ($10.00)
  • Cite this Item
If you need an accessible version of this item please contact JSTOR User Support
Lieberson's Isolation Index; A Case Study Evaluation
Preview not available

Abstract

For several good reasons the Index of Dissimilarity (D) has become the preeminent summary statistic for the measurement of spatial segregation. However, Lieberson's isolation index (P*) captures a dimension of segregation which is lost when only using D. When both measures are employed a much more complete description and analysis of trends is possible. This confirms the Duncans' (1955) conclusion that spatial segregation is too complex to be measured by one single summary statistic in isolation.

Page Thumbnails

  • Thumbnail: Page 
307
    307
  • Thumbnail: Page 
308
    308
  • Thumbnail: Page 
309
    309
  • Thumbnail: Page 
310
    310
  • Thumbnail: Page 
311
    311
  • Thumbnail: Page 
312
    312