You are not currently logged in.
Access JSTOR through your library or other institution:
If You Use a Screen ReaderThis content is available through Read Online (Free) program, which relies on page scans. Since scans are not currently available to screen readers, please contact JSTOR User Support for access. We'll provide a PDF copy for your screen reader.
Lieberson's Isolation Index; A Case Study Evaluation
Vol. 12, No. 4 (1980), pp. 307-312
Stable URL: http://www.jstor.org/stable/20001630
Page Count: 6
You can always find the topics here!Topics: Asians, Residential segregation, Housing, Personnel evaluation, Population distributions, Group size, Subject terms, Descriptive statistics, Censuses, Cities
Were these topics helpful?See somethings inaccurate? Let us know!
Select the topics that are inaccurate.
Since scans are not currently available to screen readers, please contact JSTOR User Support for access. We'll provide a PDF copy for your screen reader.
Preview not available
For several good reasons the Index of Dissimilarity (D) has become the preeminent summary statistic for the measurement of spatial segregation. However, Lieberson's isolation index (P*) captures a dimension of segregation which is lost when only using D. When both measures are employed a much more complete description and analysis of trends is possible. This confirms the Duncans' (1955) conclusion that spatial segregation is too complex to be measured by one single summary statistic in isolation.