You are not currently logged in.
Access your personal account or get JSTOR access through your library or other institution:
If You Use a Screen ReaderThis content is available through Read Online (Free) program, which relies on page scans. Since scans are not currently available to screen readers, please contact JSTOR User Support for access. We'll provide a PDF copy for your screen reader.
How Reformed Is Reformed Epistemology? Alvin Plantinga and Calvin's 'Sensus Divinitatis'
Derek S. Jeffreys
Vol. 33, No. 4 (Dec., 1997), pp. 419-431
Published by: Cambridge University Press
Stable URL: http://www.jstor.org/stable/20008123
Page Count: 13
Since scans are not currently available to screen readers, please contact JSTOR User Support for access. We'll provide a PDF copy for your screen reader.
Preview not available
Alvin Plantinga maintains that Calvin's "sensus divinitatis" is an epistemic module which can produce warranted beliefs about God. In this essay, I argue that he depicts the "sensus divinitatis" inaccurately. He fails to distinguish different kinds of knowledge of God, ignores the complexities of Calvin's discussion of natural theology, disregards Calvin's negative assessment of the "sensus divinitatis," and minimizes the noetic effect of sin. I suggest that rather than retrieving the "sensus divinitatis" as a source of knowledge, we should focus on how it reveals the perversity of the human mind.
Religious Studies © 1997 Cambridge University Press