You are not currently logged in.
Access JSTOR through your library or other institution:
If You Use a Screen ReaderThis content is available through Read Online (Free) program, which relies on page scans. Since scans are not currently available to screen readers, please contact JSTOR User Support for access. We'll provide a PDF copy for your screen reader.
Response to Phillips
Brian R. Clack
Vol. 39, No. 2 (Jun., 2003), pp. 203-209
Published by: Cambridge University Press
Stable URL: http://www.jstor.org/stable/20008463
Page Count: 7
Since scans are not currently available to screen readers, please contact JSTOR User Support for access. We'll provide a PDF copy for your screen reader.
Preview not available
In this response to D. Z. Phillips's critique of my interpretation of Wittgenstein's view of magic and ritual, I counter Phillips's claim that I have misrepresented the Wittgensteinian view of ritual, consider the instrumentalist dimension of the "Remarks on Frazer's Golden Bough," offer some objections to Phillips's expressivist view that a ritual 'says itself', and detect obscurantism in his approach to the study of religion.
Religious Studies © 2003 Cambridge University Press