Access

You are not currently logged in.

Access your personal account or get JSTOR access through your library or other institution:

login

Log in to your personal account or through your institution.

If you need an accessible version of this item please contact JSTOR User Support

Response to Phillips

Brian R. Clack
Religious Studies
Vol. 39, No. 2 (Jun., 2003), pp. 203-209
Stable URL: http://www.jstor.org/stable/20008463
Page Count: 7
  • Read Online (Free)
  • Download ($34.00)
  • Cite this Item
If you need an accessible version of this item please contact JSTOR User Support
Response to Phillips
Preview not available

Abstract

In this response to D. Z. Phillips's critique of my interpretation of Wittgenstein's view of magic and ritual, I counter Phillips's claim that I have misrepresented the Wittgensteinian view of ritual, consider the instrumentalist dimension of the "Remarks on Frazer's Golden Bough," offer some objections to Phillips's expressivist view that a ritual 'says itself', and detect obscurantism in his approach to the study of religion.

Page Thumbnails

  • Thumbnail: Page 
203
    203
  • Thumbnail: Page 
204
    204
  • Thumbnail: Page 
205
    205
  • Thumbnail: Page 
206
    206
  • Thumbnail: Page 
207
    207
  • Thumbnail: Page 
208
    208
  • Thumbnail: Page 
209
    209