You are not currently logged in.
Access JSTOR through your library or other institution:
If You Use a Screen ReaderThis content is available through Read Online (Free) program, which relies on page scans. Since scans are not currently available to screen readers, please contact JSTOR User Support for access. We'll provide a PDF copy for your screen reader.
Good, God, and the Open-Question Argument
Vol. 41, No. 3 (Sep., 2005), pp. 335-341
Published by: Cambridge University Press
Stable URL: http://www.jstor.org/stable/20008602
Page Count: 7
You can always find the topics here!Topics: Metaphysics, Intuition, Moral judgment, A posteriori knowledge, Pleasure, Identity theory, Normativity, A priori knowledge, Referents, Moral realism
Were these topics helpful?See something inaccurate? Let us know!
Select the topics that are inaccurate.
Since scans are not currently available to screen readers, please contact JSTOR User Support for access. We'll provide a PDF copy for your screen reader.
Preview not available
In "Finite and Infinite Goods," Robert Adams defends his metaphysical account that good is resemblance to God via an 'open-question' intuition. It is, however, unclear what this intuition amounts to. I give two possible readings: one based on the semantic framework Adams employs, and another based on Adams's account of humankind's epistemological limitations. I argue that neither of these readings achieves Adams's advertised aim.
Religious Studies © 2005 Cambridge University Press