You are not currently logged in.
Access JSTOR through your library or other institution:
Animal Concepts Revisited: The Use of Self-Monitoring as an Empirical Approach
Vol. 51, No. 1, Animal Mind (1999), pp. 33-40
Published by: Springer
Stable URL: http://www.jstor.org/stable/20012938
Page Count: 8
You can always find the topics here!Topics: Humans, Empirical evidence, Empiricism, Animals, Comparative psychology, Cognitive psychology, Swine, Squirrels, Ants, Attribution theory
Were these topics helpful?See somethings inaccurate? Let us know!
Select the topics that are inaccurate.
Preview not available
Many psychologists and philosophers believe that the close correlation between human language and human concepts makes the attribution of concepts to nonhuman animals highly questionable. I argue for a three-part approach to attributing concepts to animals. The approach goes beyond the usual discrimination tests by seeking evidence for self-monitoring of discrimination errors. Such evidence can be collected without relying on language and, I argue, the capacity for error-detection can only be explained by attributing a kind of internal representation that is reasonably identified as a concept. Thus I hope to have shown that worries about the empirical intractability of concepts in languageless animals are misplaced.
Erkenntnis (1975-) © 1999 Springer