If you need an accessible version of this item please contact JSTOR User Support

Semantic Holism Is Seriously False

Gerald J. Massey
Studia Logica: An International Journal for Symbolic Logic
Vol. 49, No. 1 (Mar., 1990), pp. 83-86
Published by: Springer
Stable URL: http://www.jstor.org/stable/20015480
Page Count: 4
  • Download PDF
  • Cite this Item

You are not currently logged in.

Access your personal account or get JSTOR access through your library or other institution:

login

Log in to your personal account or through your institution.

If you need an accessible version of this item please contact JSTOR User Support
Semantic Holism Is Seriously False
Preview not available

Abstract

"Semantic Holism" is the claim that any semantic path from inferential semantics (the indeterminate semantics forced by the classical inference rules of PC) reaches all the way to classical semantics if it is even one step long. In our joint paper "Semantic Holism", Belnap and I showed that some such semantic paths are two steps long, but we left open a number of questions about the lengths of semantic paths. Here I answer the most important of these questions by showing that there are infinitely long semantic paths that begin at inferential semantics but that do not even reach classical semantics. I do this by showing how to construct such an infinite semantic path from the members of the family of (n-1)-out-of-n-disjunction connectives.

Page Thumbnails

  • Thumbnail: Page 
[83]
    [83]
  • Thumbnail: Page 
84
    84
  • Thumbnail: Page 
85
    85
  • Thumbnail: Page 
86
    86