You are not currently logged in.
Access JSTOR through your library or other institution:
If You Use a Screen ReaderThis content is available through Read Online (Free) program, which relies on page scans. Since scans are not currently available to screen readers, please contact JSTOR User Support for access. We'll provide a PDF copy for your screen reader.
Depravity, Divine Responsibility and Moral Evil: A Critique of a New Free Will Defence
A. M. Weisberger
Vol. 31, No. 3 (Sep., 1995), pp. 375-390
Published by: Cambridge University Press
Stable URL: http://www.jstor.org/stable/20019758
Page Count: 16
You can always find the topics here!Topics: Free will, Evil, Moral agency, Morality, Instantiation, Legal dispositions, Divinity, Omnipotence, Foreknowledge, Necessary conditions
Were these topics helpful?See somethings inaccurate? Let us know!
Select the topics that are inaccurate.
Since scans are not currently available to screen readers, please contact JSTOR User Support for access. We'll provide a PDF copy for your screen reader.
Preview not available
A new free will defence, one which does not insist upon a necessary connection between free will and wrongdoing, has been proposed by Professor Clem Dore. I show that this attempt to clear God of blame, however, suffers from a few problems. First, in analysing the concept of free will, I argue for an interpretation which focuses upon epistemic rather than ontologic constraints. Second, I maintain that the moral relations between God and the created order should be viewed as context dependent. Other criticisms also contribute to the conclusion that this free will defence is not viable.
Religious Studies © 1995 Cambridge University Press