You are not currently logged in.
Access JSTOR through your library or other institution:
If You Use a Screen ReaderThis content is available through Read Online (Free) program, which relies on page scans. Since scans are not currently available to screen readers, please contact JSTOR User Support for access. We'll provide a PDF copy for your screen reader.
The Case of Giovanni Bastianni-II: A Hung Jury?
Anita F. Moskowitz
Artibus et Historiae
Vol. 27, No. 54 (2006), pp. 201-217
Published by: IRSA s.c.
Stable URL: http://www.jstor.org/stable/20067129
Page Count: 17
You can always find the topics here!Topics: Busts, Sculptors, Forgery, Terracotta, Rivets, Portraits, Sculpture, Bronzes, Renaissance art, Fraud
Were these topics helpful?See something inaccurate? Let us know!
Select the topics that are inaccurate.
Since scans are not currently available to screen readers, please contact JSTOR User Support for access. We'll provide a PDF copy for your screen reader.
Preview not available
The view that Giovanni Bastianini (1830-1868) participated in the deceptions regarding his work sold as Renaissance, was questioned in my recent article in this journal (no. 50, 2004). Based in part on the discovery of a damaging letter regarding Bastianini from Alessandro Foresi to the French dealer Davillier, Jeremy Warren has contended that the sculptor did, indeed, act with knowing fraudulent intent. In addition to questioning the validity of Warren's conclusions, this paper argues that Bastianini's generally uncontested reputation as a forger has created a barrier to assessing those sculptures that move beyond the historicizing, while also impeding the search for the names and styles of other masters working in stile. Scholars and curators who assume the important role of connoisseurs of Renaissance sculpture would do well to cast a less jaundiced eye on their collection of "forgeries" and related sculptures.
Artibus et Historiae © 2006 IRSA s.c.