You are not currently logged in.
Access JSTOR through your library or other institution:
If You Use a Screen ReaderThis content is available through Read Online (Free) program, which relies on page scans. Since scans are not currently available to screen readers, please contact JSTOR User Support for access. We'll provide a PDF copy for your screen reader.
Revolution and Integration in Soviet International Diplomacy, 1917-1991
Stephen White and Stephen Revell
Review of International Studies
Vol. 25, No. 4 (Oct., 1999), pp. 641-654
Published by: Cambridge University Press
Stable URL: http://www.jstor.org/stable/20097626
Page Count: 14
You can always find the topics here!Topics: Treaties, Diplomatic relations, Friendship, Diplomacy, Political revolutions, International community, International law, International cooperation, International relations, International trade
Were these topics helpful?See somethings inaccurate? Let us know!
Select the topics that are inaccurate.
Since scans are not currently available to screen readers, please contact JSTOR User Support for access. We'll provide a PDF copy for your screen reader.
Preview not available
In spite of its initial rejection of the international system, the USSR became increasingly involved in diplomatic relations with the other--largely capitalist--powers. The intensity of diplomatic activity increased from the Khrushchev years, not only in relation to other states but also to international bodies and conventions. There was a comparable change, in the later wartime years and under Khrushchev, in the proportion of foreign states with which the USSR sustained relations; by the end of the Soviet period, in 1991, there were diplomatic relations with 85 per cent of the members of the international community. This evidence supports the thesis that outcast states will tend to become 'socialised' into a more cooperative relationship with their counterparts; it also suggests that the USSR had become a largely 'normal' participant in the international system before the end of communist rule.
Review of International Studies © 1999 Cambridge University Press