You are not currently logged in.
Access JSTOR through your library or other institution:
Simple Models for Multiattribute Choice with Many Alternatives: When It Does and Does Not Pay to Face Trade-Offs with Binary Attributes
Robin M. Hogarth and Natalia Karelaia
Vol. 51, No. 12 (Dec., 2005), pp. 1860-1872
Published by: INFORMS
Stable URL: http://www.jstor.org/stable/20110473
Page Count: 13
You can always find the topics here!Topics: Multiattribute models, Management science, Term weighting, Heuristics, Modeling, Continuous variables, Rational choice theory, Simulations, Cognitive models, Memory
Were these topics helpful?See somethings inaccurate? Let us know!
Select the topics that are inaccurate.
Preview not available
Given the difficulties people experience in making trade-offs, what are the consequences of using simple models that avoid trade-offs? We examine choices by such models in environments where "true" preferences are linear and attributes are characterized by binary attributes. A deterministic elimination-by-aspects (DEBA) model is highly effective over a range of conditions. When preferences are quite compensatory, however, a modified equal weighting (EW) model that uses DEBA to resolve ties is more effective. We explore the sensitivity of results to errors in using DEBA, to different distributions of alternatives, and to error in "true" preferences. Under the conditions examined here, the outcomes of these "boundedly rational" models are highly consistent with "rational" models that explicitly confront trade-offs. We emphasize the importance of binary attributes in reaching these conclusions.
Management Science © 2005 INFORMS