You are not currently logged in.
Access your personal account or get JSTOR access through your library or other institution:
Foundationalism, Circular Justification, and the Levels Gambit
James A. Keller
Vol. 68, No. 2, Issues in Epistemology (Aug., 1986), pp. 205-212
Published by: Springer
Stable URL: http://www.jstor.org/stable/20116305
Page Count: 8
Preview not available
In 'Foundationalism, Coherentism, and the Levels Gambit', David Shatz argued that foundationalists must countenance a circular mediate justification of perceptual beliefs which the foundationalist holds are already immediately justified. Because the circularity of coherentist accounts of the justification of beliefs is a major basis of foundationalist criticism of coherentism, Shatz's claim is a serious challenge to foundationalism. In this paper, using a moderate foundationalism with a reliabilist conception of justification, I give an account of immediately and mediately justified beliefs which shows that such a foundationalism need not accept such a circular justification (and in crucial cases cannot do so) and that Shatz's claim is therefore incorrect.
Synthese © 1986 Springer