Access

You are not currently logged in.

Access your personal account or get JSTOR access through your library or other institution:

login

Log in to your personal account or through your institution.

Foundationalism, Circular Justification, and the Levels Gambit

James A. Keller
Synthese
Vol. 68, No. 2, Issues in Epistemology (Aug., 1986), pp. 205-212
Published by: Springer
Stable URL: http://www.jstor.org/stable/20116305
Page Count: 8
  • Download ($43.95)
  • Cite this Item
Foundationalism, Circular Justification, and the Levels Gambit
Preview not available

Abstract

In 'Foundationalism, Coherentism, and the Levels Gambit', David Shatz argued that foundationalists must countenance a circular mediate justification of perceptual beliefs which the foundationalist holds are already immediately justified. Because the circularity of coherentist accounts of the justification of beliefs is a major basis of foundationalist criticism of coherentism, Shatz's claim is a serious challenge to foundationalism. In this paper, using a moderate foundationalism with a reliabilist conception of justification, I give an account of immediately and mediately justified beliefs which shows that such a foundationalism need not accept such a circular justification (and in crucial cases cannot do so) and that Shatz's claim is therefore incorrect.

Page Thumbnails

  • Thumbnail: Page 
[205]
    [205]
  • Thumbnail: Page 
206
    206
  • Thumbnail: Page 
207
    207
  • Thumbnail: Page 
208
    208
  • Thumbnail: Page 
209
    209
  • Thumbnail: Page 
210
    210
  • Thumbnail: Page 
211
    211
  • Thumbnail: Page 
212
    212