You are not currently logged in.
Access JSTOR through your library or other institution:
Duhem in Different Contexts: Comments on Brenner and Martin
Philip L. Quinn and Phillip L. Quinn
Vol. 83, No. 3, Pierre Duhem: Historian and Philosopher of Science. Part II: Duhem as Philosopher of Science (Jun., 1990), pp. 357-362
Published by: Springer
Stable URL: http://www.jstor.org/stable/20116793
Page Count: 6
You can always find the topics here!Topics: Theology, History of science, Christianity, Instrumentalism, Islam, Natural order, Christian history, Philosophical realism, Medieval philosophy, Thought
Were these topics helpful?See somethings inaccurate? Let us know!
Select the topics that are inaccurate.
Preview not available
These comments consist of reflections on the papers Anastasios Brenner and R. N. D. Martin presented at the Conference on Pierre Duhem: Historian and Philosopher of Science. I argue they present nicely complementary accounts of Duhem's turn to history of science: Brenner emphasizes reasons internal to Duhem's philosophical concern with scientific methodology while Martin highlights reasons derived from the broader context of Duhem's engagement with religious controversies of his culture. I go on to suggest that seeing Duhem in this broader perspective can help us cope with the conflicts between science and religion in our own culture.
Synthese © 1990 Springer