You are not currently logged in.
Access JSTOR through your library or other institution:
Getting Fancy with Probability
Henry E. Kyburg Jr.
Vol. 90, No. 2, Uncertainty and Probability (Feb., 1992), pp. 189-203
Published by: Springer
Stable URL: http://www.jstor.org/stable/20116997
Page Count: 15
You can always find the topics here!Topics: Inference, Cinerary urns, Probabilities, Probability distributions, Dutch book argument, Mathematical functions, Real numbers, Betting, Algebra, Mathematical intervals
Were these topics helpful?See somethings inaccurate? Let us know!
Select the topics that are inaccurate.
Preview not available
There are a number of reasons for being interested in uncertainty, and there are also a number of uncertainty formalisms. These formalisms are not unrelated. It is argued that they can all be reflected as special cases of the approach of taking probabilities to be determined by sets of probability functions defined on an algebra of statements. Thus, interval probabilities should be construed as maximum and minimum probabilities within a set of distributions, Glenn Shafer's belief functions should be construed as lower probabilities, etc. Updating probabilities introduces new considerations, and it is shown that the representation of belief as a set of probabilities conflicts in this regard with the updating procedures advocated by Shafer. The attempt to make subjectivistic probability plausible as a doctrine of rational belief by making it more flowery -- i.e., by adding new dimensions -- does not succeed. But, if one is going to represent beliefs by sets of distributions, those sets of distributions might as well be based in statistical knowledge, as they are in epistemological or evidential probability.
Synthese © 1992 Springer