You are not currently logged in.
Access JSTOR through your library or other institution:
Omitting Data: Ethical or Strategic Problem?
Vol. 145, No. 2, Candor in Science (Jun., 2005), pp. 169-176
Published by: Springer
Stable URL: http://www.jstor.org/stable/20118590
Page Count: 8
You can always find the topics here!Topics: Interrogatives, Scientific ethics, Games, Electric charge, Research fraud, Tax fraud, Ethical epistemology, Game theory, Truth
Were these topics helpful?See something inaccurate? Let us know!
Select the topics that are inaccurate.
Preview not available
Omitting experimental data is often considered a violation of scientific integrity. If we consider experimental inquiry as a questioning process, omitting data is seen to be merely an example of tentatively rejecting ('bracketing') some of nature's answers. Such bracketing is not only occasionally permissible; sometimes it is mandated by optimal interrogative strategies. When to omit data is therefore a strategic rather than ethical question. These points are illustrated by reference to Milikan's oil drop experiment.
Synthese © 2005 Springer