You are not currently logged in.
Access JSTOR through your library or other institution:
Confidence Intervals and the Scientific Method: A Case for Holm on the Range
Ronald C. Serlin
The Journal of Experimental Education
Vol. 61, No. 4, Statistical Significance Testing in Contemporary Practice (Summer, 1993), pp. 350-360
Published by: Taylor & Francis, Ltd.
Stable URL: http://www.jstor.org/stable/20152386
Page Count: 11
You can always find the topics here!Topics: Confidence interval, Null hypothesis, False positive errors, Test ranges, Critical values, Philosophical psychology, Social psychology, Error rates, Psychological research, Telescopes
Were these topics helpful?See somethings inaccurate? Let us know!
Select the topics that are inaccurate.
Preview not available
Based on principles of modern philosophy of science, it can be concluded that it is the magnitude of a population effect that is the essential quantity to examine in determining support or lack of support for a theoretical prediction. To test for theoretical support, the corresponding statistical null hypothesis must be derived from the theoretical prediction, which means that we must specify and test a range null hypothesis. Similarly, confidence intervals based on range null hypotheses are required. Certain of the newer multiple comparison procedures are discussed in terms of their applicability to the problem of generating confidence intervals based on range null hypotheses to control the familywise Type I error rate in multiple-sample experiments.
The Journal of Experimental Education © 1993 Taylor & Francis, Ltd.