You are not currently logged in.
Access JSTOR through your library or other institution:
If You Use a Screen ReaderThis content is available through Read Online (Free) program, which relies on page scans. Since scans are not currently available to screen readers, please contact JSTOR User Support for access. We'll provide a PDF copy for your screen reader.
Is High Employee Turnover Really Harmful? An Empirical Test Using Company Records
Arie C. Glebbeek and Erik H. Bax
The Academy of Management Journal
Vol. 47, No. 2 (Apr., 2004), pp. 277-286
Published by: Academy of Management
Stable URL: http://www.jstor.org/stable/20159578
Page Count: 10
You can always find the topics here!Topics: Employee turnover, Modeling, Control variables, Human resources, Offices, Mathematical dependent variables, Economic costs, Office management, Financial management, Business structures
Were these topics helpful?See somethings inaccurate? Let us know!
Select the topics that are inaccurate.
Since scans are not currently available to screen readers, please contact JSTOR User Support for access. We'll provide a PDF copy for your screen reader.
Preview not available
We tested the hypothesis that employee turnover and firm performance have an inverted U-shaped relationship: overly high or low turnover is harmful. Our analysis was based on economic performance data from 110 offices of a temporary employment agency. These offices had high variation in turnover but were otherwise similar, allowing control for important intervening variables. Regression analysis revealed a curvilinear relationship; high turnover was harmful, but the inverted U-shape was not observed with certainty.
The Academy of Management Journal © 2004 Academy of Management