You are not currently logged in.
Access JSTOR through your library or other institution:
If You Use a Screen ReaderThis content is available through Read Online (Free) program, which relies on page scans. Since scans are not currently available to screen readers, please contact JSTOR User Support for access. We'll provide a PDF copy for your screen reader.
Social Comparison: Why, with Whom, and with What Effect?
Jerry Suls, René Martin and Ladd Wheeler
Current Directions in Psychological Science
Vol. 11, No. 5 (Oct., 2002), pp. 159-163
Stable URL: http://www.jstor.org/stable/20182799
Page Count: 5
You can always find the topics here!Topics: Social comparison, Munchausen syndrome by proxy, Proxy reporting, Proxy statements, Preliminary proxy material, Psychological assessment, Social psychology, Cognitive psychology, Personality psychology, Wellbeing
Were these topics helpful?See something inaccurate? Let us know!
Select the topics that are inaccurate.
Since scans are not currently available to screen readers, please contact JSTOR User Support for access. We'll provide a PDF copy for your screen reader.
Preview not available
Social comparison consists of comparing oneself with others in order to evaluate or to enhance some aspects of the self. Evaluation of ability is concerned with the question "Can I do X?" and relies on the existence of a proxy performer. A proxy's relative standing on attributes vis-à-vis the comparer and whether the proxy exerted maximum effort on a preliminary task are variables influencing his or her informational utility. Evaluation of opinions is concerned with the questions "Do I like X?" Is X correct?" and "Will I like X?" Important variables that affect an individual's use of social comparison to evaluate hisor her opinions are the other person's expertise, similarity with the individual, and previous agreement with the individual. Whether social comparison serves a self-enhancement function depends on whether the comparer assimilates or contrasts his or her self relative to superior or inferrior others. The kinds of self-knowledge made cognitively accessible and variables such as mutability of self-views and distinctiveness of the comparison target may be important determinants of assimilation versus contrast.
Current Directions in Psychological Science © 2002 Association for Psychological Science