You are not currently logged in.
Access JSTOR through your library or other institution:
If You Use a Screen ReaderThis content is available through Read Online (Free) program, which relies on page scans. Since scans are not currently available to screen readers, please contact JSTOR User Support for access. We'll provide a PDF copy for your screen reader.
Studies Of The Effect Of Immunoglobulin On Rubella In Pregnancy Report Of The Public Health Laboratory Service Working Party On Rubella
The British Medical Journal
Vol. 2, No. 5708 (May 30, 1970), pp. 497-500
Published by: BMJ
Stable URL: http://www.jstor.org/stable/20383880
Page Count: 4
You can always find the topics here!Topics: Rubella, Immunoglobulins, Antibodies, Dosage, Pregnancy, Public health, Rubella virus, Infections, Viruses, Globulins
Were these topics helpful?See somethings inaccurate? Let us know!
Select the topics that are inaccurate.
Since scans are not currently available to screen readers, please contact JSTOR User Support for access. We'll provide a PDF copy for your screen reader.
Preview not available
Studies were done on 5,447 pregnant women given immunoglobulin after exposure to rubella and on 652 adult women similary at risk but not pregnant and therefore not given immunoglobulin. The amounts of immunoglobulin, of known antibody content ranged from 750 mg. to more than 1,500 mg.; in a few second doses were given. Preinoculation blood samples from both groups showed that about 15% were still susceptible. Second blood samples were obtained from many of the women and nasal and throat swabs from as many index cases as possible. In the development of rubella by susceptible women a major factor was an index case in the same household. Whether judged on the serological evidence alone, or as a result of exposure to a confirmed index case, immunoglobulin in the amounts given did not appear to affect the incidence of rubella by comparison with the uninoculated group. Suppression of clinical manifestations attributable to immunoglobulin was possible in a few instances, but this could also have been an example of natural variation.
The British Medical Journal © 1970 BMJ