You are not currently logged in.
Access your personal account or get JSTOR access through your library or other institution:
If You Use a Screen ReaderThis content is available through Read Online (Free) program, which relies on page scans. Since scans are not currently available to screen readers, please contact JSTOR User Support for access. We'll provide a PDF copy for your screen reader.
The Ethics of Science: Leonardo Sciascia and the Majorana Case
The Modern Language Review
Vol. 102, No. 4 (Oct., 2007), pp. 1021-1034
Published by: Modern Humanities Research Association
Stable URL: http://www.jstor.org/stable/20467548
Page Count: 14
Since scans are not currently available to screen readers, please contact JSTOR User Support for access. We'll provide a PDF copy for your screen reader.
Preview not available
The enquiry into the unexplained disappearance in 1938 of the Sicilian physicist Ettore Majorana takes the form of an "inchiesta," a quasi-historical genre devised by Leonardo Sciascia, whose nature is subjected to analysis. Sciascia acknowledged a twin debt to Voltaire and Pirandello, but the Voltairean element prevailed in ethical enquiries. The scientist's disappearance, motivated in Sciascia's view by his apprehensions over the direction of nuclear physics, becomes a metaphor for general discussion of the moral responsibility of scientists for their discoveries, a debate carried on by contrasting the conduct of Werner Heisenberg in obstructing Hitler's atomic programme and that of J. Robert Oppenheimer in leading the research which produced the Hiroshima bomb.
The Modern Language Review © 2007 Modern Humanities Research Association