You are not currently logged in.
Access JSTOR through your library or other institution:
If You Use a Screen ReaderThis content is available through Read Online (Free) program, which relies on page scans. Since scans are not currently available to screen readers, please contact JSTOR User Support for access. We'll provide a PDF copy for your screen reader.
Animals and Animality from the Island of Moreau to the Uplift Universe
The Yearbook of English Studies
Vol. 37, No. 2, Science Fiction (2007), pp. 85-102
Published by: Modern Humanities Research Association
Stable URL: http://www.jstor.org/stable/20479303
Page Count: 18
You can always find the topics here!Topics: Humans, Animals, Novels, Feminism, Pornography, Fudge, Victorians, Vivisection, Bioethics, Men
Were these topics helpful?See something inaccurate? Let us know!
Select the topics that are inaccurate.
Since scans are not currently available to screen readers, please contact JSTOR User Support for access. We'll provide a PDF copy for your screen reader.
Preview not available
This essay argues that H. G. Wells's "The Island of Doctor Moreau" is best understood in the context of feminist critiques of science, animal studies, and antivivisectionism. This context allows us to see that the novel's themes are concerned with the very foundational assumptions of science as a practice that objectifies and 'tames' nature and all those (non-whites, women, the working classes) who are associated with the body and nature. A comparison of Wells's novel with David Brin's Uplift series -- more explicitly concerned with imagining animal sentience -- reveals that Brin's failure to critique the values of science crystalized in the 'unmarked' body of the 'scientist' (white, male, bourgeois, "Homo sapiens") results in a more conservative treatment of subjectivity and ethics in this latter work.
The Yearbook of English Studies © 2007 Modern Humanities Research Association