You are not currently logged in.
Access JSTOR through your library or other institution:
If You Use a Screen ReaderThis content is available through Read Online (Free) program, which relies on page scans. Since scans are not currently available to screen readers, please contact JSTOR User Support for access. We'll provide a PDF copy for your screen reader.
Statehood, Secularization, Cooptation: Explaining Democratic Survival in Inter-War Europe — Stein Rokkan's Conceptual Map Revisited
Frank Aarebrot and Sten Berglund
Historical Social Research / Historische Sozialforschung
Vol. 20, No. 2 (74), Historisch-vergleichende Makrosoziologie: Stein Rokkan - der Beitrag eines Kosmopoliten aus der Peripherie (1995), pp. 210-225
Published by: GESIS - Leibniz Institute for the Social Sciences
Stable URL: http://www.jstor.org/stable/20755966
Page Count: 16
You can always find the topics here!Topics: Democracy, Political parties, Catholicism, Muslims, Countries, Pluralist school, Secularization, Nation building, Cultural preservation, Statehood
Were these topics helpful?See somethings inaccurate? Let us know!
Select the topics that are inaccurate.
Since scans are not currently available to screen readers, please contact JSTOR User Support for access. We'll provide a PDF copy for your screen reader.
Preview not available
This article addresses itself to the crisis of democracy in inter-war Europe which saw the breakdown of one democratic regime after the other with Czechoslovakia as the only survivor case in Eastern and Central Europe by the end of this period. It is cast within the framework of Stein Rokkan's seminal conceptual map of Europe which is expanded in order to account for countries and variables originally not included in his analytical scheme. The analysis leads to the following conclusion: where the state building was weak and the legacy of empire strong, or where secular nation building was still impaired by deeply rooted religious sentiments, or where significant segments representing major cleavages where not coopted into a constitutional compromise, the chances for democratic survival in inter-war Europe were slim indeed. The conclusion applies to the inter-war era alone, but it clearly has implications for contemporary Europe. Noting that statehood and secularization ranked high on the agenda of communist Eastern Europe, the authors raise the paradoxical question if the success of democracy in this part of the world may in fact be a byproduct of the extent to which the now defunct communist regimes were successful in promoting their pet goals.
Historical Social Research / Historische Sozialforschung © 1995 GESIS - Leibniz Institute for the Social Sciences