You are not currently logged in.
Access JSTOR through your library or other institution:
If You Use a Screen ReaderThis content is available through Read Online (Free) program, which relies on page scans. Since scans are not currently available to screen readers, please contact JSTOR User Support for access. We'll provide a PDF copy for your screen reader.
The Reasonableness of Actuarial Assumptions in Individual Defined Benefit Plans: Vinson & Elkins v. Commissioner and Wachtell, Lipton, Rosen & Katz v. Commissioner
William M. Katz, Jr.
The Tax Lawyer
Vol. 47, No. 1 (Fall 1993), pp. 279-290
Published by: American Bar Association
Stable URL: http://www.jstor.org/stable/20771605
Page Count: 12
You can always find the topics here!Topics: Interest rates, Actuarial science, Taxes, Defined benefit plans, Taxpaying, Actuarial assumptions, Tax attorneys, Investment risk, Assumption of risk, Financial investments
Were these topics helpful?See somethings inaccurate? Let us know!
Select the topics that are inaccurate.
Since scans are not currently available to screen readers, please contact JSTOR User Support for access. We'll provide a PDF copy for your screen reader.
Preview not available
The Tax Lawyer © 1993 American Bar Association