You are not currently logged in.
Access JSTOR through your library or other institution:
If You Use a Screen ReaderThis content is available through Read Online (Free) program, which relies on page scans. Since scans are not currently available to screen readers, please contact JSTOR User Support for access. We'll provide a PDF copy for your screen reader.
The Dynamics of Aggregate Partisanship
Janet M. Box-Steffensmeier and Renée M. Smith
The American Political Science Review
Vol. 90, No. 3 (Sep., 1996), pp. 567-580
Published by: American Political Science Association
Stable URL: http://www.jstor.org/stable/2082609
Page Count: 14
You can always find the topics here!Topics: Political partisanship, Party identification, Political science, Time series, Empirical evidence, Aggregation, Null hypothesis, Permanence, Political parties, Maximum likelihood estimation
Were these topics helpful?See something inaccurate? Let us know!
Select the topics that are inaccurate.
Since scans are not currently available to screen readers, please contact JSTOR User Support for access. We'll provide a PDF copy for your screen reader.
Preview not available
Despite extensive research on party identification, links between partisanship at the individual and aggregate level have largely been ignored. This leaves a gap in our understanding of the dynamics of aggregate partisanship. To remedy this, we identify a set of ideal types that capture the essential arguments made about individual-level party identification. We then combine the behavioral assumptions for each type with existing results on statistical aggregation to deduce the specific temporal pattern that each type implies for aggregate levels of partisanship. Using new diagnostic tests and a highly general time series model, we find that aggregate measures of partisanship from 1953 through 1992 are fractionally integrated. Our evidence that the effects of a shock to aggregate partisanship last for years--not months or decades--challenges previous work by party systems theorists and students of "macropartisanship." Our arguments and empirical evidence provide a conceptually richer and more precise basis for theories of issue evolution or endogenous preferences--in which partisanship plays a central role.
The American Political Science Review © 1996 American Political Science Association