You are not currently logged in.
Access JSTOR through your library or other institution:
If You Use a Screen ReaderThis content is available through Read Online (Free) program, which relies on page scans. Since scans are not currently available to screen readers, please contact JSTOR User Support for access. We'll provide a PDF copy for your screen reader.
Kvalitetsmätning med citationsindex — en fallgrop för sociologin
THOMAS BRANTE and SUNE SUNESSON
Vol. 27, No. 2, Jordbruk, småföretag, samhällsplanering (1990), pp. 47-57
Stable URL: http://www.jstor.org/stable/20851005
Page Count: 11
Since scans are not currently available to screen readers, please contact JSTOR User Support for access. We'll provide a PDF copy for your screen reader.
Preview not available
It is argued that citation indexing, or citation addition, is a dubious method for measuring scientific quality. The technical and substantial problems of this method are so severe that it is not even viable to regard it as an 'indirect' or 'supplementary' heuristic, as it is sometimes suggested. Further, the method will drastically alter the strategic rationality of individual scientists as well as scientific networks. To introduce citation addition on a broad scale in social science would be tantamount to handing over our remaining fragmentary control over its intellectual content to a mechanic, bureaucratic — and foreign — counting device.
Sociologisk Forskning © 1990 Sveriges Sociologförbund (Swedish Sociological Association)