You are not currently logged in.
Access JSTOR through your library or other institution:
If You Use a Screen ReaderThis content is available through Read Online (Free) program, which relies on page scans. Since scans are not currently available to screen readers, please contact JSTOR User Support for access. We'll provide a PDF copy for your screen reader.
Status Consistency and Symptoms of Stress
Elton F. Jackson
American Sociological Review
Vol. 27, No. 4 (Aug., 1962), pp. 469-480
Published by: American Sociological Association
Stable URL: http://www.jstor.org/stable/2090028
Page Count: 12
You can always find the topics here!Topics: Psychological stress, Crystallization, Liberalism, Social classes, Statistical significance, Psychological research, Social psychology, Social research, Educational research, Scope of employment
Were these topics helpful?See somethings inaccurate? Let us know!
Select the topics that are inaccurate.
Since scans are not currently available to screen readers, please contact JSTOR User Support for access. We'll provide a PDF copy for your screen reader.
Preview not available
The stressful impact of status inconsistency on the individual is examined with national survey data, using expressed psychophysiological symptoms as the indicator of psychological disturbance. Inconsistency due to racial-ethnic rank superior to occupational or educational rank is associated with high symptom levels; although the opposite patterns of inconsistency are not, they have been shown in previous research to be associated with political liberalism. These findings are interpreted to mean that all forms of status inconsistency are psychologically disturbing, but that response to this stress varies with the relative positions of the inconsistent person's achieved and ascribed status ranks and with his achieved status per se. Also, sex appears to influence response to occupation--education inconsistencies. These findings provide support for a multi-dimensional view of social stratification.
American Sociological Review © 1962 American Sociological Association