You are not currently logged in.
Access your personal account or get JSTOR access through your library or other institution:
If You Use a Screen ReaderThis content is available through Read Online (Free) program, which relies on page scans. Since scans are not currently available to screen readers, please contact JSTOR User Support for access. We'll provide a PDF copy for your screen reader.
The Norm of Even-Handedness in Surveys as in Life
Howard Schuman and Jacob Ludwig
American Sociological Review
Vol. 48, No. 1 (Feb., 1983), pp. 112-120
Published by: American Sociological Association
Stable URL: http://www.jstor.org/stable/2095149
Page Count: 9
Since scans are not currently available to screen readers, please contact JSTOR User Support for access. We'll provide a PDF copy for your screen reader.
Preview not available
Results from four past split-ballot experiments are drawn on to show that a norm of even-handedness operates in surveys much as it does in the rest of life: contextual linkage leads to greater consistency in the treatment of two competing parties than would occur if each were considered in isolation. A fifth experiment, developed to test this theory, provides partial confirmation but also evidence that the norm can create effects in one direction only. In addition, a sixth experiment is reviewed which emphasizes the fact that a presumed need for psychological consistency is too vague a description of the forces at work. Only where consistency receives normative definition and direction does the context effect occur. Finally, an attempt is made to specify types of persons most susceptible to the context effect, but further evidence will be needed in order to achieve more complete understanding on this point.
American Sociological Review © 1983 American Sociological Association