You are not currently logged in.
Access JSTOR through your library or other institution:
If You Use a Screen ReaderThis content is available through Read Online (Free) program, which relies on page scans. Since scans are not currently available to screen readers, please contact JSTOR User Support for access. We'll provide a PDF copy for your screen reader.
The Legitimation of Structural Inequality: Reformulation and Test of the Self-Evaluation Argument
John F. Stolte
American Sociological Review
Vol. 48, No. 3 (Jun., 1983), pp. 331-342
Published by: American Sociological Association
Stable URL: http://www.jstor.org/stable/2095226
Page Count: 12
Since scans are not currently available to screen readers, please contact JSTOR User Support for access. We'll provide a PDF copy for your screen reader.
Preview not available
Why does a disadvantaged actor, as well as an advantaged actor, often accept a structure of inequality as right, reasonable, and legitimate? The self-evaluation argument proposes that variation in objective resource level produces variation in self-evaluation, which, in turn, leads both deprived and privileged actors to accept their respective positions as legitimate. The argument is clarified through a reformulation that links exchange structural inequality, negotiation, and self-efficacy. The reformulation is experimentally tested. Though the results diametrically oppose a key implication of the reformulation, they stimulate thinking that further illuminates this core issue in the social psychology of stratification, and they lay a basis for further research.
American Sociological Review © 1983 American Sociological Association