You are not currently logged in.
Access JSTOR through your library or other institution:
If You Use a Screen ReaderThis content is available through Read Online (Free) program, which relies on page scans. Since scans are not currently available to screen readers, please contact JSTOR User Support for access. We'll provide a PDF copy for your screen reader.
Conservative Protestantism and Support for Corporal Punishment
Christopher G. Ellison and Darren E. Sherkat
American Sociological Review
Vol. 58, No. 1 (Feb., 1993), pp. 131-144
Published by: American Sociological Association
Stable URL: http://www.jstor.org/stable/2096222
Page Count: 14
You can always find the topics here!Topics: Protestantism, Human nature, Christianity, Parents, Children, Bible, Biblical literalism, Child psychology, Parenting, Church of Jesus Christ of Latter Day Saints
Were these topics helpful?See something inaccurate? Let us know!
Select the topics that are inaccurate.
Since scans are not currently available to screen readers, please contact JSTOR User Support for access. We'll provide a PDF copy for your screen reader.
Preview not available
Conservative Protestants disproportionately support the use of corporal punishment. We theorize that their relative enthusiasm for corporal punishment reflects the impact of three components of religious ideology: (1) an acceptance of the doctrine of biblical literalism; (2) the conviction that human nature (and hence the nature of young children) is inherently sinful; (3) and the belief that human sin demands punishment. These arguments about the religious roots of support for corporal punishment are evaluated using data from the 1988 General Social Survey. OLS and structural equation models generally confirm our theoretical model. The findings invite further research into the impact of religious factors on parental values and practices.
American Sociological Review © 1993 American Sociological Association