You are not currently logged in.
Access your personal account or get JSTOR access through your library or other institution:
If You Use a Screen ReaderThis content is available through Read Online (Free) program, which relies on page scans. Since scans are not currently available to screen readers, please contact JSTOR User Support for access. We'll provide a PDF copy for your screen reader.
"Increment" and "Base" in the Congressional Appropriations Process
John R. Gist
American Journal of Political Science
Vol. 21, No. 2 (May, 1977), pp. 341-352
Published by: Midwest Political Science Association
Stable URL: http://www.jstor.org/stable/2110498
Page Count: 12
Since scans are not currently available to screen readers, please contact JSTOR User Support for access. We'll provide a PDF copy for your screen reader.
Preview not available
This paper examines the concepts of the budget "increment" and "base" in terms of budgetary trends at the federal level over the past dozen years. By comparing the annual increments in federal budget authority and budget "uncontrollables," the paper shows that the annual budget increment, while it has historically been the locus of budgetary strategies, has been largely or entirely absorbed by disproportionate increases in uncontrollables. As a consequence, controllable items in the budget base have become a necessary target for budget reductions, particularly in times of economic stringency. The effect of this trend on congressional spending power and the consequences of the 1974 Budget Reform Act are then discussed.
American Journal of Political Science © 1977 Midwest Political Science Association