You are not currently logged in.
Access your personal account or get JSTOR access through your library or other institution:
If You Use a Screen ReaderThis content is available through Read Online (Free) program, which relies on page scans. Since scans are not currently available to screen readers, please contact JSTOR User Support for access. We'll provide a PDF copy for your screen reader.
Betting After the Race is Over: The Perils of Post Hoc Hypothesizing
James L. Payne and James A. Dyer
American Journal of Political Science
Vol. 19, No. 3 (Aug., 1975), pp. 559-564
Published by: Midwest Political Science Association
Stable URL: http://www.jstor.org/stable/2110545
Page Count: 6
Since scans are not currently available to screen readers, please contact JSTOR User Support for access. We'll provide a PDF copy for your screen reader.
Preview not available
Using a recent article by Sidney Ulmer as an example, this note offers two bits of advice to statistical researchers. One must take care to specify his hypotheses on an a priori basis. One must be cautious when the number of observations approaches the number of independent variables.
American Journal of Political Science © 1975 Midwest Political Science Association