You are not currently logged in.
Access your personal account or get JSTOR access through your library or other institution:
If You Use a Screen ReaderThis content is available through Read Online (Free) program, which relies on page scans. Since scans are not currently available to screen readers, please contact JSTOR User Support for access. We'll provide a PDF copy for your screen reader.
Measuring Representation: Perils of the Correlation Coefficient
Christopher H. Achen
American Journal of Political Science
Vol. 21, No. 4 (Nov., 1977), pp. 805-815
Published by: Midwest Political Science Association
Stable URL: http://www.jstor.org/stable/2110737
Page Count: 11
Since scans are not currently available to screen readers, please contact JSTOR User Support for access. We'll provide a PDF copy for your screen reader.
Preview not available
Most empirical research on representation has used correlational measures. The larger the correlation between representatives' and constituents' views, the stronger the bonds between them are thought to be. Unfortunately, correlations incorporate not only the strength of a relationship, but also the diversity of the sampled constituencies. When constituencies are very different from each other on an issue dimension, large correlations will result even when voters are not particularly sensitive to that dimension. Large correlations can occur when representatives are distant from their constituents; small correlations can happen when they are near. Correlations should be abandoned in the study of representation.
American Journal of Political Science © 1977 Midwest Political Science Association