You are not currently logged in.
Access JSTOR through your library or other institution:
If You Use a Screen ReaderThis content is available through Read Online (Free) program, which relies on page scans. Since scans are not currently available to screen readers, please contact JSTOR User Support for access. We'll provide a PDF copy for your screen reader.
Women as Policymakers: The Case of Trial Judges
John Gruhl, Cassia Spohn and Susan Welch
American Journal of Political Science
Vol. 25, No. 2 (May, 1981), pp. 308-322
Published by: Midwest Political Science Association
Stable URL: http://www.jstor.org/stable/2110855
Page Count: 15
You can always find the topics here!Topics: Defendants, Women, Men, Criminal sentencing, Prisons, Judges, Criminals, Gender roles, Guilty verdicts
Were these topics helpful?See something inaccurate? Let us know!
Select the topics that are inaccurate.
Since scans are not currently available to screen readers, please contact JSTOR User Support for access. We'll provide a PDF copy for your screen reader.
Preview not available
Previous research analyzing differences between men and women political elites has focused primarily on attitudinal differences, recruitment patterns, or background characteristics. In contrast, this research looks at possible behavioral differences. It examines the convicting and sentencing behavior of men and women judges in over 30,000 felony cases in "Metro City." In particular, it compares the behavior of men and women judges in convicting and sentencing male and female defendants. The findings indicate that women judges generally did not convict and sentence defendants differently than men judges did. However, women judges were considerably more likely to sentence female defendants to prison than men judges were.
American Journal of Political Science © 1981 Midwest Political Science Association