You are not currently logged in.
Access your personal account or get JSTOR access through your library or other institution:
If You Use a Screen ReaderThis content is available through Read Online (Free) program, which relies on page scans. Since scans are not currently available to screen readers, please contact JSTOR User Support for access. We'll provide a PDF copy for your screen reader.
American Party Platforms and Public Opinion
Alan D. Monroe
American Journal of Political Science
Vol. 27, No. 1 (Feb., 1983), pp. 27-42
Published by: Midwest Political Science Association
Stable URL: http://www.jstor.org/stable/2111051
Page Count: 16
Since scans are not currently available to screen readers, please contact JSTOR User Support for access. We'll provide a PDF copy for your screen reader.
Preview not available
The party responsibility, spatial, and cleavage theories make different assumptions about the relationship of party issue stands to the distribution of public opinion. This study matched promises in Republican and Democratic platforms from 1960 through 1980 with public opinion data from national surveys and then determined the outcomes of policy decisions on those issues. Both parties tended to adopt positions favored by a majority of the public. Parties tended to go against popular majorities on issues of greatest concern to their established constituencies. Therefore, the greatest support was found for the cleavage theory as an explanation of party decision making. The data also suggest that parties are indeed an important link between public opinion and public policy.
American Journal of Political Science © 1983 Midwest Political Science Association