You are not currently logged in.
Access JSTOR through your library or other institution:
If You Use a Screen ReaderThis content is available through Read Online (Free) program, which relies on page scans. Since scans are not currently available to screen readers, please contact JSTOR User Support for access. We'll provide a PDF copy for your screen reader.
The Effects of Question Order in Attitude Surveys: The Case of the SRC/CPS Citizen Duty Items
Paul R. Abramson, Brian D. Silver and Barbara A. Anderson
American Journal of Political Science
Vol. 31, No. 4 (Nov., 1987), pp. 900-908
Published by: Midwest Political Science Association
Stable URL: http://www.jstor.org/stable/2111228
Page Count: 9
You can always find the topics here!Topics: Voting, Civic duty, Citizenship, Attitude surveys, Mathematical sequences, Political science, Questionnaires, Voter registration, State elections, Political elections
Were these topics helpful?See something inaccurate? Let us know!
Select the topics that are inaccurate.
Since scans are not currently available to screen readers, please contact JSTOR User Support for access. We'll provide a PDF copy for your screen reader.
Preview not available
Campbell and his colleagues developed a four-item scale that measured support for the norm of citizen duty and found that feelings of citizen duty were strongly correlated with electoral participation. Although the four citizen-duty items were used in seven SRC/CPS National Election Studies (NES) between 1952 and 1980, the 1984 NES employed only one of them: "If a person doesn't care how an election comes out then that person shouldn't vote in it." The percentage disagreeing with this statement, and hence endorsing the citizen duty norm, fell from 58.7 in 1980 to 42.8 in 1984. We argue that this apparent decline in feelings of citizen duty is very likely to be a methodological artifact resulting from changed questionnaire content and question order. In previous surveys, this item was preceded by two other citizen duty items with which respondents expressed overwhelming disagreement. Without first having answered these preceding items, respondents were much less likely to disagree with the "doesn't care, shouldn't vote" item. This interpretation is supported by analyses of the 1952 NES, in which the order of the citizen duty items was varied systematically. Our analyses suggest that even apparently minor changes in questionnaire content can substantially affect the distribution of responses to attitudinal questions.
American Journal of Political Science © 1987 Midwest Political Science Association