You are not currently logged in.
Access JSTOR through your library or other institution:
If You Use a Screen ReaderThis content is available through Read Online (Free) program, which relies on page scans. Since scans are not currently available to screen readers, please contact JSTOR User Support for access. We'll provide a PDF copy for your screen reader.
Activists and Economic Policymaking in Congress
Darrell M. West
American Journal of Political Science
Vol. 32, No. 3 (Aug., 1988), pp. 662-680
Published by: Midwest Political Science Association
Stable URL: http://www.jstor.org/stable/2111241
Page Count: 19
You can always find the topics here!Topics: Voting, Legislators, Tax cuts, Political parties, Conservatism, Congressional districts, Reaganomics, Public opinion, Constituents, Government spending
Were these topics helpful?See something inaccurate? Let us know!
Select the topics that are inaccurate.
Since scans are not currently available to screen readers, please contact JSTOR User Support for access. We'll provide a PDF copy for your screen reader.
Preview not available
This paper examines the role of activist opinion in congressional decision making on Reaganomics. Although several scholars have noted that legislators distinguish ordinary citizens from more informed activists having intense preferences within districts, empirical research has not incorporated this insight into the analysis. Using data that measure activist opinion on Reagan's 1981 economic program, member perceptions of their voting decisions, and a variety of other district and Washington factors, I demonstrate that even though many representatives believed they enacted Reaganomics because of policy sentiments within their districts, there is persuasive evidence indicating member partisanship and conservatism were more important than district factors. These contrasting conclusions about constituency effects, however, can be reconciled by showing that members did respond to district sentiments, but that they defined district opinion in terms of activist opinion. I conclude by noting the implications of these findings for congressional policymaking and democratic theory.
American Journal of Political Science © 1988 Midwest Political Science Association