You are not currently logged in.
Access JSTOR through your library or other institution:
If You Use a Screen ReaderThis content is available through Read Online (Free) program, which relies on page scans. Since scans are not currently available to screen readers, please contact JSTOR User Support for access. We'll provide a PDF copy for your screen reader.
Alternative Measures of Political Tolerance: Must Tolerance be "Least-Liked"?
James L. Gibson
American Journal of Political Science
Vol. 36, No. 2 (May, 1992), pp. 560-577
Published by: Midwest Political Science Association
Stable URL: http://www.jstor.org/stable/2111491
Page Count: 18
You can always find the topics here!Topics: Communism, Political science, Social surveys, Statistical variance, Collection policy, Summer, Regression coefficients, Racism, Repression, Etiology
Were these topics helpful?See somethings inaccurate? Let us know!
Select the topics that are inaccurate.
Since scans are not currently available to screen readers, please contact JSTOR User Support for access. We'll provide a PDF copy for your screen reader.
Preview not available
In this article I consider how to measure political intolerance. The traditional Stouffer-based measure of intolerance is compared to the Sullivan, Piereson, and Marcus "least-liked" measure using data from a national survey. While the alternative measures of intolerance are not strongly intercorrelated, apparently the lack of correlation is largely a function of random measurement error. This conclusion is based on the empirical finding that the traditional predictors of intolerance perform very similarly irrespective of which of the tolerance measures is used. Since substantive conclusions about the origins of intolerance are insensitive to the index employed, I argue that future tolerance research can profitably utilize either measurement approach.
American Journal of Political Science © 1992 Midwest Political Science Association