You are not currently logged in.
Access JSTOR through your library or other institution:
If You Use a Screen ReaderThis content is available through Read Online (Free) program, which relies on page scans. Since scans are not currently available to screen readers, please contact JSTOR User Support for access. We'll provide a PDF copy for your screen reader.
A Comparative Analysis of Public and Private Sector Entrant Quality
Philip E. Crewson
American Journal of Political Science
Vol. 39, No. 3 (Aug., 1995), pp. 628-639
Published by: Midwest Political Science Association
Stable URL: http://www.jstor.org/stable/2111647
Page Count: 12
You can always find the topics here!Topics: Private sector, Government services, Merit system, Human resources, Employment, Government, Public sector, Public administration, Government bureaucracy, Civil service
Were these topics helpful?See somethings inaccurate? Let us know!
Select the topics that are inaccurate.
Since scans are not currently available to screen readers, please contact JSTOR User Support for access. We'll provide a PDF copy for your screen reader.
Preview not available
Public and private sector employees differ in ways that run counter to the prediction that poor monetary incentives or image battering will leave the public sector disadvantaged in hiring quality employees. When controlling for sex, race, economic status, and occupation, entrants into the federal sector are better qualified than private sector entrants. Past research on the issue of employee quality is supplemented with a comparative analysis of public and private sector entrants during the 1980s. In the comparative analysis, AFQT scores are used as an indicator of quality. Contrary to predictions of a crisis in public employee competence, the federal government was able to attract higher quality entrants during the 1980s than the private sector.
American Journal of Political Science © 1995 Midwest Political Science Association