You are not currently logged in.
Access JSTOR through your library or other institution:
If You Use a Screen ReaderThis content is available through Read Online (Free) program, which relies on page scans. Since scans are not currently available to screen readers, please contact JSTOR User Support for access. We'll provide a PDF copy for your screen reader.
Alliance Duration and Democracy: An Extension and Cross-Validation of "Democratic States and Commitment in International Relations"
American Journal of Political Science
Vol. 41, No. 3 (Jul., 1997), pp. 1072-1078
Published by: Midwest Political Science Association
Stable URL: http://www.jstor.org/stable/2111689
Page Count: 7
You can always find the topics here!Topics: Alliances, Democracy, Military alliances, International alliances, Mathematical dependent variables, Polities, Analytical estimating, World wars, Temporal logic, Modeling
Were these topics helpful?See somethings inaccurate? Let us know!
Select the topics that are inaccurate.
Since scans are not currently available to screen readers, please contact JSTOR User Support for access. We'll provide a PDF copy for your screen reader.
Preview not available
Neoliberal institutionalism suggests that the international behavior of democracies differs from that of other regime types. This paper extends and cross-validates the empirical analyses in Gaubatz (1996). In the research update here, alliances are analyzed over the period 1815-1993. A discrete-time event history analysis (EHA) is employed to estimate the hazard rate. Validating Gaubatz's finding, the addition of democratic members to an alliance has a significant negative impact on the probability of alliance failure. This relationship exists even when controlling for the number of members in the alliance, the type of alliance, the number of major powers in the alliance, and periods of world war.
American Journal of Political Science © 1997 Midwest Political Science Association