You are not currently logged in.
Access JSTOR through your library or other institution:
If You Use a Screen ReaderThis content is available through Read Online (Free) program, which relies on page scans. Since scans are not currently available to screen readers, please contact JSTOR User Support for access. We'll provide a PDF copy for your screen reader.
Sex Roles and Interpersonal Behavior in Task-Oriented Groups
B. F. Meeker and P. A. Weitzel-O'Neill
American Sociological Review
Vol. 42, No. 1 (Feb., 1977), pp. 91-105
Published by: American Sociological Association
Stable URL: http://www.jstor.org/stable/2117733
Page Count: 15
You can always find the topics here!Topics: Men, Gender roles, Social psychology, Sex linked differences, Social behavior, Women, Social interaction, Personality psychology, Prestige, Conformity
Were these topics helpful?See something inaccurate? Let us know!
Select the topics that are inaccurate.
Since scans are not currently available to screen readers, please contact JSTOR User Support for access. We'll provide a PDF copy for your screen reader.
Preview not available
In the past, sociologists have proposed that men and women approach situations in which they have to work with other people differently; that men are "task" or "instrumental" specialists, while women are "social" or "expressive" specialists. Subsequent advances in research on the social psychology of small groups, on families, and on personality has largely removed the theoretical and empirical supports for this proposition. On the other hand, researchers continue to observe sex differences in behavior in a variety of task-oriented situations. This paper suggests that sex roles may be seen as the result of status processes. Since men have higher status than women, men are expected to be more competent than women and it is expected that competitive or dominating behavior is legitimate for men but not for women. Empirical studies of sex roles as related to task appropriateness, group problem solving, conflict, dominating behavior and role expectations are reviewed in support of this theory.
American Sociological Review © 1977 American Sociological Association