You are not currently logged in.
Access JSTOR through your library or other institution:
If You Use a Screen ReaderThis content is available through Read Online (Free) program, which relies on page scans. Since scans are not currently available to screen readers, please contact JSTOR User Support for access. We'll provide a PDF copy for your screen reader.
The Central Pacific Railroad and the Railroad Land Grant Controversy
The Journal of Economic History
Vol. 35, No. 3 (Sep., 1975), pp. 552-566
Stable URL: http://www.jstor.org/stable/2119557
Page Count: 15
You can always find the topics here!Topics: Investment return rates, Mortgage bonds, Stock shares, Land economics, Land use, Government bonds, Subsidies, Economic capital, Financial investments, Return on capital
Were these topics helpful?See something inaccurate? Let us know!
Select the topics that are inaccurate.
Since scans are not currently available to screen readers, please contact JSTOR User Support for access. We'll provide a PDF copy for your screen reader.
Preview not available
This paper asks whether grants of land were necessary to influence either the decision to construct or the speed of construction of the Central Pacific Railroad. Federal bond subsidies permitted large divergences between the private rates of return on total capital and on entrepreneurial capital. The paper presents several estimates of ex post and ex ante rates of return on entrepreneurial capital, excluding profits from land sales. None of these are less than 71 percent per year over a seven-year period. Given plausible estimates of rates of return on entrepreneurial funds in alternative projects ranging from 15 to 25 percent per year, and given the structure of the bond subsidy, the paper concludes that the land grants examined were unnecessary.
The Journal of Economic History © 1975 Economic History Association